| Ukraine: Integrity Scorecard Report > Sub-Category: Legislative Accountability | ||
| Indicators | Score | |
| 29 | Can members of the legislature be held accountable for their actions? | 50 |
| 30 | Are there regulations governing conflicts of interest by members of the national legislature? | 14 |
| 31 | Can citizens access the asset disclosure records of members of the national legislature? | 0 |
| 32 | Can citizens access legislative processes and documents? | 83 |
Indicator and sub-Indicator Details
| 29 | Can members of the legislature be held accountable for their actions? | |||||||
| 29a: In law, the judiciary can review laws passed by the legislature. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Comments: In law, only the Constitutional Court can rule an act issued by the Verkhovna Rada unconstitutional. References: Constitution of Ukraine Law "On the Constitutional Court of Ukraine," Art. 61
|
||||||||
| 29b: In practice, when necessary, the judiciary reviews laws passed by the legislature. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Comments: When necessary, the Constitutional Court declares laws or parts of laws unconstitutional. An example of this is reviews by Constitutional Court of Ukraine Presidential Decree for pre-term election. In September 2006, the President of Ukraine adopted a Concept Paper "On the Way to Integrity" which analyses risks and elaborates possible ways to prevent and fight corruption. The Ministry of Justice is currently developing an action plan, which will need to identify clear responsibilities, deadlines, practical measures and budgetary allocations for implementation of the concept. It is expected that once developed, the action plan will be submitted to the Cabinet of Ministers for adoption. A mechanism for effective coordination and monitoring of the implementation of the concept and the action plan will need to be developed. The current coordination mechanism through the Interdepartmental Commission for prevention and fighting corruption at the National Security and Defense Council does not appear strong enough. A leading institution that would be in charge of taking further the anticorruption agenda, and will ensure effective coordination of various institutions and the monitoring of implementation, needs to be nominated and supported with necessary mandate and resources. In the area of implementation of the legislation, especially in law enforcement, the low level of communication between various agencies has a negative impact on anticorruption efforts. Thus only a small number of cases find their way to courts, even fewer ending in convictions. Sharing of data and gathering consolidated statistics remains a challenge. In Ukraine there is no specialized anticorruption prosecution unit empowered to detect, investigate and prosecute corrupt activities. A wide debate continues over the need to set up a unique structure that would include representatives from all law enforcement forces either as an independent agency or within one of the institutions that already exist. There is the risk that a prolonged discussion and lack of practical steps might wear down the remaining public trust in the political class and their will to challenge the old patterns. References: Constitutional Court of Ukraine Anti-Corruption Network for Eastern Europe and Central Asia, 2006 Istanbul Anti-Corruption Action Plan for Ukraine Monitoring of National Actions to Implement Recommendations Endorsed During the Reviews of Legal and Institutional Frameworks for the Fight against Corruption, 2006 Monitoring report was adopted at the 6th Monitoring Meeting of the Istanbul Anti-Corruption Action Plan on Dec. 12, 2006 at the OECD Headquarters in Paris
Peer Review Comments: In recent years, the composition and activities of the Constitutional Court have become very politicized so that its ability to act as a mediator in the conflict between the branches of power has been compromised. In practice, the court avioded ruling on controversial political issues as much as possible. In addition, in August 2006 a law was passed by the Verkhovna Rada and signed by the president which prevented the Constitutional Court reviewing the legality of the constitutional amendments adopted at the height of the Orange Revolution on 8 December 2004. This law of dubious constitutionality itself remains on the statute books.
|
||||||||
| 29c: In law, are members of the national legislature subject to criminal proceedings? | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Comments: In law, members of the legislature are immune from the prosecution. National Deputies of Ukraine are guaranteed parliamentary immunity. National Deputies of Ukraine are not legally liable for the results of voting or for statements made in Parliament and in its bodies, with the exception of liability for insult or defamation. National Deputies of Ukraine shall not be held criminally liable, detained or arrested without the consent of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. References: Art. 80, Constitution of Ukraine
|
||||||||
| 30 | Are there regulations governing conflicts of interest by members of the national legislature? | |||||||
| 30a: In law, members of the national legislature are required to file an asset disclosure form. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Comments: References: Art. 1, Law "On Fighting Corruption"
|
||||||||
| 30b: In law, there are restrictions for national legislators entering the private sector after leaving the government. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Comments: There are restrictions for national legislators entering the private sector only when they occupied government positions. References: Interview with MP
|
||||||||
| 30c: In law, there are regulations governing gifts and hospitality offered to members of the national legislature. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Comments: There is no regulation concerning gifts and hospitality for members of the legislature. Article 1 of the Law "On Fighting Corruption" offers an explanation about gifts and hospitality for members of the legislature. Article 2 of the same Law explains who is meant by "members of the legislature." References: Art. 1, Law "On Fighting Corruption"
|
||||||||
| 30d: In law, there are requirements for the independent auditing of the asset disclosure forms of members of the national legislature. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Comments: In law, MPs are required to file an asset disclosure form, as are all other public officials, but they are not a subject for auditing. References: Art. 6, Law "On Civil Service" Art. 13, Law "On Fighting Corruption"
|
||||||||
| 30e: In practice, the regulations restricting post-government private sector employment for national legislators are effective. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Comments: There are no restrictions. References: Interviews with MP
Peer Review Comments: Also worth noting is that, although the law prohibits legislators from business activites while holding a deputy's mandate, in practice this is widespread with a large proportion of deputies continuing to engage in business activities at the same time as being an MP.
|
||||||||
| 30f: In practice, the regulations governing gifts and hospitality offered to national legislators are effective. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Comments: References: Interviews with MP
|
||||||||
| 30g: In practice, national legislative branch asset disclosures are audited. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Comments: References: Accounting Chambe of Ukraine [ LINK ]
|
||||||||
| 31 | Can citizens access the asset disclosure records of members of the national legislature? | |||||||
| 31a: In law, citizens can access the asset disclosure records of members of the national legislature. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Comments: There is no regulation that requires public access to the asset disclosure records of MPs. References: Interview with MP Levchenko K. Kiev. Aug. 4, 2007
|
||||||||
| 31b: In practice, citizens can access legislative asset disclosure records within a reasonable time period. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Comments: References: Interviews with MP
|
||||||||
| 31c: In practice, citizens can access legislative asset disclosure records at a reasonable cost. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Comments: References: Interviews with MP
Peer Review Comments: It is very difficult to obtain a record, but not due to cost.
|
||||||||
| 32 | Can citizens access legislative processes and documents? | |||||||
| 32a: In law, citizens can access records of legislative processes and documents. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Comments: The law "On Information" makes no exception for public access to the records of legislative processes and documents. Only in the case of classified documents and closed hearings (e.g. on defense issues), is public access impossible. References: The law "On Information"
|
||||||||
| 32b: In practice, citizens can access records of legislative processes and documents within a reasonable time period. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Comments: In practice, citizens can access unclassified records of legislative processes and documents immediately through the Internet. References: www.pravda.com.ua
Peer Review Comments: The Verkhovna Rada Web site makes extensive documentation on the legislative process available almost immediately. Other documentation (e.g. some internal committee documentation) is in principle open but takes time to obtain. It is sometimes the case that records have gaps in particularly sensitive cases.
Peer Review Comments: In practice, many records are available online, but some are not and are very difficult for regular citizens to obtain.
|
||||||||
| 32c: In practice, citizens can access records of legislative processes and documents at a reasonable cost. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Comments: References: Available on the Internet www.4vlada.net
|
||||||||



