Peer Reviewer 1:
This is a very good story. There are some spelling errors and a few mistakes. However, the main problem appears to be that aspersions have been made against some members of Parliament and the reporter does not indicate whether they have had the opportunity to respond to them. This may have been done in the mainstream media, in which case I would have no problem with them reappearing here. I believe the reporter should be asked about this. Otherwise it is a good and relevant article.