Global Integrity Report HomeGlobal Integrity Home
The Global Integrity Report (report.globalintegrity.org)
2008 Assessment

Romania: Integrity Indicators Scorecard

Romania: Integrity Scorecard Report > Sub-Category: Public Access to Information
Indicators   Score
12 Do citizens have a legal right of access to information? 100
13 Is the right of access to information effective? 50

Indicator and sub-Indicator Details

12 Do citizens have a legal right of access to information?
 
  12a: In law, citizens have a right of access to government information and basic government records.
 
Score: YES  NO score
  Comments:

References: Constitution. Law 544/2001 on access to information of public interest (FOIA) Law 52/2003 on transparency of the decision-making process (Sunshine Act)

  12b: In law, citizens have a right of appeal if access to a basic government record is denied.
 
Score: YES  NO score
  Comments:

References: Law 544/2001 on access to information of public interest (FOIA) Law 52/2003 on transparency of the decision-making process (Sunshine Act)

  12c: In law, there is an established institutional mechanism through which citizens can request government records.
 
Score: YES  NO score
  Comments: However, the office of the Ombudsman is not very visible of active.

References: The office of the Ombudsman, set up by Law 35/1997.

13 Is the right of access to information effective?
 
  13a: In practice, citizens receive responses to access to information requests within a reasonable time period.
 
Score: 100  75  50  25  0  score
  Comments: The FOIA law says the data should be provided in 10 (working) days, or alternatively a justification should be given and the term can be extended to 30 (working) days. The problem, as always, is enforcement: some public institutions or companies pretend they are not covered by the law, if not funded directly from the national budget (they are). And, in general, there is very little information disclosed ex officio in the relevant format by authorities, to reduce the need to send repeated and customized demands for information (the law specifies the bits of info that should be disclosed "in the right format").

References: - Monica Macovei, lawyer and civil society activist, APADOR-Helsinki Committee, former minister of Justice, Aug. 12, 2008, Bucharest - Nicoleta Popescu, lawyer and civil society activist, APADOR-Helsinki Committee, Aug. 12, 2008, Bucharest

  13b: In practice, citizens can use the access to information mechanism at a reasonable cost.
 
Score: 100  75  50  25  0  score
  Comments:

References: - Monica Macovei, lawyer and civil society activist, APADOR-Helsinki Committee, former minister of Justice, Aug. 12, 2008, Bucharest - Nicoleta Popescu, lawyer and civil society activist, APADOR-Helsinki Committee, Aug. 12, 2008, Bucharest

  13c: In practice, citizens can resolve appeals to access to information requests within a reasonable time period.
 
Score: 100  75  50  25  0  score
  Comments: Usually when sensitive bits of information are not disclosed upon the first request, a whole uphill struggle is necessary in order to squeeze them out of the institution. Journalists are more likely to be successful in these attempts than ordinary citizens.

References: - Monica Macovei, lawyer and civil society activist, APADOR-Helsinki Committee, former minister of Justice, Aug. 12, 2008, Bucharest - Nicoleta Popescu, lawyer and civil society activist, APADOR-Helsinki Committee, Aug. 12, 2008, Bucharest

  13d: In practice, citizens can resolve appeals to information requests at a reasonable cost.
 
Score: 100  75  50  25  0  score
  Comments:

References: - Monica Macovei, lawyer and civil society activist, APADOR-Helsinki Committee, former minister of Justice, Aug. 12, 2008, Bucharest - Nicoleta Popescu, lawyer and civil society activist, APADOR-Helsinki Committee, Aug. 12, 2008, Bucharest

  13e: In practice, the government gives reasons for denying an information request.
 
Score: 100  75  50  25  0  score
  Comments:

References: - Monica Macovei, lawyer and civil society activist, APADOR-Helsinki Committee, former minister of Justice, Aug. 12, 2008, Bucharest - Nicoleta Popescu, lawyer and civil society activist, APADOR-Helsinki Committee, Aug. 12, 2008, Bucharest

Global Integrity uses a Creative Commons licence, unless noted here: Terms of Use.
1029 Vermont Ave NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20005 USA
Phone: 1.202.449.4100   -   Fax: 1.866.681.8047   -   info@globalintegrity.org