Global Integrity Report HomeGlobal Integrity Home
2008 Assessment

Kazakhstan: Integrity Indicators Scorecard

Kazakhstan: Integrity Scorecard Report > Sub-Category: Rule of Law
Indicators   Score
77 Is there an appeals mechanism for challenging criminal judgments? 75
78 Do judgments in the criminal system follow written law? 100
79 Are judicial decisions enforced by the state? 100
80 Is the judiciary able to act independently? 63
81 Are judges safe when adjudicating corruption cases? 100
82 Do citizens have equal access to the justice system? 93

Indicator and sub-Indicator Details

77 Is there an appeals mechanism for challenging criminal judgments?
 
  77a: In law, there is a general right of appeal.
 
Score: YES  NO score
  Comments: The purposes of judicial authority are to protect the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of citizens and organizations; and to ensure execution of the Constitution, laws, other normative legal acts and international agreements. . Judicial protection is guaranteed to everyone against wrongful decisions and actions of state bodies, organizations, and official and other persons restraining or limiting the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests stipulated by the Constitution and laws.

By law, no one can be deprived of the right to consideration of his/her affair by a valid, competent, independent and impartial court.

Judicial authority is carried out by means of civil, criminal and other forms of legal proceedings established by law.

References: Constitutional law of the Republic of Kazakhstan on the judicial system and the status of judges of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Dec. 25, 2000, #132-II (with changes and additions in accordance with the state on Dec. 11, 2006), Section 1, Article 1

  77b: In practice, appeals are resolved within a reasonable time period.
 
Score: 100  75  50  25  0  score
  Comments:

References: Alibekov Saylau, professor, Kazakh University of International Relations and World Languages, July, 20, 2008, Almaty

Kozyreva Evgeniya, president of the Feminist League, Aug. 4, 2008, Almaty, Kazakhstan

  77c: In practice, citizens can use the appeals mechanism at a reasonable cost.
 
Score: 100  75  50  25  0  score
  Comments:

References: Alibekov Saylau, professor, Kazakh University of International Relations and World Languages, July, 20, 2008, Almaty

Kozyreva Evgeniya, president of the Feminist League, Aug. 4, 2008, Almaty, Kazakhstan

78 Do judgments in the criminal system follow written law?
 
  78: In practice, do judgments in the criminal system follow written law?
 
Score: 100  75  50  25  0  score
  Comments:

References: Alibekov Saylau, professor, Kazakh University of International Relations and World Languages, July, 20, 2008, Almaty

Kozyreva Evgeniya, president of the Feminist League, Aug. 4, 2008, Almaty, Kazakhstan

79 Are judicial decisions enforced by the state?
 
  79: In practice, are judicial decisions enforced by the state?
 
Score: 100  75  50  25  0  score
  Comments:

References: Alibekov Saylau, professor, Kazakh University of International Relations and World Languages, July, 20, 2008, Almaty

Kozyreva Evgeniya, president of the Feminist League, Aug. 4, 2008, Almaty, Kazakhstan

80 Is the judiciary able to act independently?
 
  80a: In law, the independence of the judiciary is guaranteed.
 
Score: YES  NO score
  Comments: Judges are independent and enforce only the Constitution and law.

References: Constitutional law of the Republic of Kazakhstan on the judicial system and the status of judges of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Dec. 25, 2000, #132-II (with changes and additions in accordance with the state on Dec. 11, 2006), Article 1

  80b: In practice, national-level judges are protected from political interference.
 
Score: 100  75  50  25  0  score
  Comments:

References: Alibekov Saylau, professor, Kazakh University of International Relations and World Languages, July, 20, 2008, Almaty

Kozyreva Evgeniya, president of the Feminist League, Aug. 4, 2008, Almaty, Kazakhstan

  80c: In law, there is a transparent and objective system for distributing cases to national-level judges.
 
Score: YES  NO score
  Comments: Law contains no articles providing a transparent and objective system for distributing cases to national -level judges.

References: Constitutional law of the Republic of Kazakhstan on the judicial system and the status of judges of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Dec. 25, 2000, #132-II (with changes and additions in accordance with the state on Dec. 11, 2006)

Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan (adopted by referendum on Aug. 30,1995 (with alterations and additions in accordance with the state on May 21, 2007

  80d: In law, national-level judges are protected from removal without relevant justification.
 
Score: YES  NO score
  Comments: Grounds for termination of a judges powers are 1) the judges resignation or discharge from office pursuant to his own wish. 2) a state of health impeding further performance of professional duties, in accordance with a medical opinion. 3) recognizing the judge as legally incapable or restrictedly incapable, or applying compulsory measures of a medical nature to him. 4) conviction of a judge. 5) loss of citizenship in the Republic of Kazakhstan. 6) death of the judge or a court decision recognizing him as deceased. 7) appointment or election of the judge to another position or his transfer to another job. abolishment of the court or expiration of powers, if the judge does not agree to take up a vacant position as judge in another court.

The powers of a judge may be terminated due to a decision of a disciplinary and qualification collegium of judges on the need of discharge the judge from office for disciplinary misconduct or failure to meet the requirements stipulated in Article 28 of this law.

The powers of the chairman of a court or the chairman of a collegium may be terminated early if they fail to meet the requirements stipulated in Articles 9, 14, 15, 20, 21 and 28 of this law.

The decision to discharge a judge from office shall be made by 1) a resolution of the Senate, after input from the chairmen of the judicial collegia and judges of the Supreme Court, pursuant to a proposal by the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2) a decree by the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, after input from the chairmen of the collegia and a judge of oblast courts, and the chairman and a judge of a district court.

References: Constitutional law of the Republic of Kazakhstan on the judicial system and the status of judges of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Dec. 25, 2000, #132-II (with changes and additions in accordance with the state on Dec. 11, 2006), Article 34

81 Are judges safe when adjudicating corruption cases?
 
  81a: In practice, in the last year, no judges have been physically harmed because of adjudicating corruption cases.
 
Score: YES  NO score
  Comments:

References: Alibekov Saylau, professor, Kazakh University of International Relations and World Languages, July, 20, 2008, Almaty

Kozyreva Evgeniya, president of the Feminist League, Aug. 4, 2008, Almaty, Kazakhstan

  81b: In practice, in the last year, no judges have been killed because of adjudicating corruption cases.
 
Score: YES  NO score
  Comments:

References: Alibekov Saylau, professor, Kazakh University of International Relations and World Languages, July, 20, 2008, Almaty

Kozyreva Evgeniya, president of the Feminist League, Aug. 4, 2008, Almaty, Kazakhstan

82 Do citizens have equal access to the justice system?
 
  82a: In practice, judicial decisions are not affected by racial or ethnic bias.
 
Score: 100  75  50  25  0  score
  Comments:

References: Alibekov Saylau, professor, Kazakh University of International Relations and World Languages, July, 20, 2008, Almaty

Kozyreva Evgeniya, president of the Feminist League, Aug. 4, 2008, Almaty, Kazakhstan

  82b: In practice, women have full access to the judicial system.
 
Score: 100  75  50  25  0  score
  Comments:

References: Alibekov Saylau, professor, Kazakh University of International Relations and World Languages, July, 20, 2008, Almaty

Kozyreva Evgeniya, president of the Feminist League, Aug. 4, 2008, Almaty, Kazakhstan

  82c: In law, the state provides legal counsel for defendants in criminal cases who cannot afford it.
 
Score: YES  NO score
  Comments: Citizens can be exempted from payment for legal assistance due to their financial situation.

References: Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan on advocacy, Dec. 5, 1997, #195-I (with alterations and additions in accordance with the state on May 22, 2007), Article 6

  82d: In practice, the state provides adequate legal counsel for defendants in criminal cases who cannot afford it.
 
Score: 100  75  50  25  0  score
  Comments:

References: Alibekov Saylau, professor, Kazakh University of International Relations and World Languages, July, 20, 2008, Almaty

Kozyreva Evgeniya, president of the Feminist League, Aug. 4, 2008, Almaty, Kazakhstan

  82e: In practice, citizens earning the median yearly income can afford to bring a legal suit.
 
Score: 100  75  50  25  0  score
  Comments:

References: Alibekov Saylau, professor, Kazakh University of International Relations and World Languages, July, 20, 2008, Almaty

Kozyreva Evgeniya, president of the Feminist League, Aug. 4, 2008, Almaty, Kazakhstan

  82f: In practice, a typical small retail business can afford to bring a legal suit.
 
Score: 100  75  50  25  0  score
  Comments:

References: Alibekov Saylau, professor, Kazakh University of International Relations and World Languages, July, 20, 2008, Almaty

Kozyreva Evgeniya, president of the Feminist League, Aug. 4, 2008, Almaty, Kazakhstan

  82g: In practice, all citizens have access to a court of law, regardless of geographic location.
 
Score: 100  75  50  25  0  score
  Comments:

References: Alibekov Saylau, professor, Kazakh University of International Relations and World Languages, July, 20, 2008, Almaty

Kozyreva Evgeniya, president of the Feminist League, Aug. 4, 2008, Almaty, Kazakhstan

Global Integrity uses a Creative Commons licence, unless noted here: Terms of Use.
1029 Vermont Ave NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20005 USA
Phone: 1.202.449.4100   -   Fax: 1.866.681.8047   -   info@globalintegrity.org