2007 Assessment
Jordan: 2007
This peer-reviewed country report includes:
Integrity Indicators Scorecard: Scores, scoring criteria, commentary, references, and peer review perspectives for more than 300 Integrity Indicators.
Reporter's Notebook: An on-the-ground look at corruption and integrity from a leading local journalist.
Corruption Timeline: Ten years of political context to today's corruption and integrity issues.
Country Facts: Statistical context for each country.
Integrity Indicators Scorecard: Scores, scoring criteria, commentary, references, and peer review perspectives for more than 300 Integrity Indicators.
Reporter's Notebook: An on-the-ground look at corruption and integrity from a leading local journalist.
Corruption Timeline: Ten years of political context to today's corruption and integrity issues.
Country Facts: Statistical context for each country.
Jordan has several important institutions that score moderately, and key assessments of openness — civil society participation, the media environment and freedom of information — score moderate to strong. Jordan's performance in executive, legislative and judicial accountability and political financing is among the worst recorded in 2007. Executive accountability practices, like asset disclosure or even the ability to prosecute high officials is lacking. There is no election monitoring agency (or equivalent process), suggesting that while voting is generally inclusive, election results may not be secure.
Yemeni Parliamentarians Draft a Right to Information Bill
Yemeni Parliamentations Draft a Right to Information Bill
Global Integrity Report: 2009 - Country List
Freedom of Information: A Comparative Study
For Access to Government Information, Middle East and North Africa Is Worst In the World
The New York Times and Squishy Theories of Corruption
Visit Global Integrity Commons for recent analysis on Jordan.




