Global Integrity Report HomeGlobal Integrity Home
2007 Assessment

Armenia: Integrity Indicators Scorecard

Armenia: Integrity Scorecard Report > Sub-Category: Law Enforcement
Indicators   Score
80 Is the law enforcement agency (i.e. the police) effective? 25
81 Can law enforcement officials be held accountable for their actions? 50

Indicator and sub-Indicator Details

80 Is the law enforcement agency (i.e. the police) effective?
 
  80a: In practice, appointments to the law enforcement agency (or agencies) are made according to professional criteria.
 
Score: 100  75  50  25  0  score
  Comments: Appointments to law agencies are ofhen based on protectionism, patronage and nepotism. There are cases of bribery also.

References: Interview with Stephan Danielyan, chairman of Collaboration for Democracy Union (August 8, 2007, at his office) Media reports

  80b: In practice, the law enforcement agency (or agencies) has a budget sufficient to carry out its mandate.
 
Score: 100  75  50  25  0  score
  Comments:

References: Media reporting Interview with Stephan Danielyan, chairman of Collaboration for Democracy Union (August 8, 2007, at his office)

  80c: In practice, the law enforcement agency is protected from political interference.
 
Score: 100  75  50  25  0  score
  Comments: The government and governing parties are negatively influenced on the work of police and other enforcement agencies. The Ministry of Defense is privileged as former Prime Minister Vazgen Sarkissyan gave a lot of privileges to military authorities. The situation continued when Serzh Sarkissyan became the minister of Defense. The military police and military prosecution office are closed systems.

References: Media reporting Interview with Stephan Danielyan, chairman of Collaboration for Democracy Union (August 8, 2007, at his office)

81 Can law enforcement officials be held accountable for their actions?
 
  81a: In law, there is an independent mechanism for citizens to complain about police action.
 
Score: YES  NO score
  Comments:

References: The Criminal Code and the Law on Ombudsman of the Republic of Armenia www.arlis.am

  81b: In practice, the independent law enforcement complaint reporting mechanism responds to citizen's complaints within a reasonable time period.
 
Score: 100  75  50  25  0  score
  Comments: In practice, police agencies didn't respond to citizens within a reasonable time period.

References: Interview with Stephan Danielyan, chairman of Collaboration for Democracy Union (August 8, 2007, at his office) Media reports

  81c: In law, there is an agency/entity to investigate and prosecute corruption committed by law enforcement officials.
 
Score: YES  NO score
  Comments:

References: The Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia www.arlis.am

  81d: In practice, when necessary, the agency/entity independently initiates investigations into allegations of corruption by law enforcement officials.
 
Score: 100  75  50  25  0  score
  Comments: There are few cases of investigations of corruption related to police officials. According to the recent survey of Transparency International, 98.7% of respondents consider the most corrupted state institution as the traffic police. (See 2006 Corruption Perception Armenia, Yerevan , 2007, p.16.)

References: Media reporting Interview with Stephan Danielyan, chairman of Collaboration for Democracy Union (August 8, 2007, at his office) 2006 Corruption Perception in Armenia, Yerevan, 2007, United Nations Development Programme Armenia, Transparency International Armenia

  81e: In law, law enforcement officials are not immune from criminal proceedings.
 
Score: YES  NO score
  Comments:

References: The Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia www.arlis.am

  81f: In practice, law enforcement officials are not immune from criminal proceedings.
 
Score: 100  75  50  25  0  score
  Comments: No law-eforcement authority has been punished in recent years, however, there are a lot of cases of violation of law by them.

References: Media reporting Interview with Stephan Danielyan, chairman of Collaboration for Democracy Union (August 8, 2007, at his office)

Global Integrity uses a Creative Commons licence, unless noted here: Terms of Use.
1029 Vermont Ave NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20005 USA
Phone: 1.202.449.4100   -   Fax: 1.866.681.8047   -   info@globalintegrity.org