| Angola : Integrity Scorecard Report > Sub-Category: Whistle-blowing Measures | ||
| Indicators | Score | |
| 48 | Are employees protected from recrimination or other negative consequences when reporting corruption (i.e. whistle-blowing)? | 0 |
| 49 | Is there an internal mechanism (i.e. phone hotline, e-mail address, local office) through which civil servants can report corruption? | 0 |
| 50 | In practice, is the internal mechanism (i.e. phone hotline, e-mail address, local office) through which civil servants can report corruption effective? | 0 |
Indicator and sub-Indicator Details
| 48 | Are employees protected from recrimination or other negative consequences when reporting corruption (i.e. whistle-blowing)? | |||||||
| 48a: In law, civil servants who report cases of corruption, graft, abuse of power, or abuse of resources are protected from recrimination or other negative consequences. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Comments: References: No such whistle-blower protection legislation exists.
|
||||||||
| 48b: In practice, civil servants who report cases of corruption, graft, abuse of power, or abuse of resources are protected from recrimination or other negative consequences. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Comments: References: No such whistle-blower protection legislation exists.
|
||||||||
| 48c: In law, private sector employees who report cases of corruption, graft, abuse of power, or abuse of resources are protected from recrimination or other negative consequences. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Comments: References: No such whistle-blower protection legislation exists.
|
||||||||
| 48d: In practice, private sector employees who report cases of corruption, graft, abuse of power, or abuse of resources are protected from recrimination or other negative consequences. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Comments: References: No such whistle-blower protection legislation exists.
|
||||||||
| 49 | Is there an internal mechanism (i.e. phone hotline, e-mail address, local office) through which civil servants can report corruption? | |||||||
| 49: In law, is there an internal mechanism (i.e. phone hotline, e-mail address, local office) through which civil servants can report corruption? | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Comments: Angola is listed here as having no such agency. The envisioned High Authority Against Corruption does not yet exist in practice. References: Information Portal on Corruption in Africa, African Anti-Corruption Hotlines. [ LINK ].
|
||||||||
| 50 | In practice, is the internal mechanism (i.e. phone hotline, e-mail address, local office) through which civil servants can report corruption effective? | |||||||
| 50a: In practice, the internal reporting mechanism for public sector corruption has a professional, full-time staff. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Comments: References: No such mechanism exists.
|
||||||||
| 50b: In practice, the internal reporting mechanism for public sector corruption receives regular funding. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Comments: References: No such mechanism exists.
|
||||||||
| 50c: In practice, the internal reporting mechanism for public sector corruption acts on complaints within a reasonable time period. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Comments: References: No such mechanism exists.
|
||||||||
| 50d: In practice, when necessary, the internal reporting mechanism for public sector corruption initiates investigations. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Comments: References: No such mechanism exists.
|
||||||||



